Walz v. Vance VP Debate - Post-Game Thread | Vance now says Trump won in 2020

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 628
  • Views: 12K
  • Politics 
What the hell, I thought this thing was only 90 minutes? It's getting to be past my bedtime.
 
Callatoroy said:
No way on this earth you think she would be a good president or that she is qualified or competent to be president. Her only qualification to you guys is she isn’t trump. No way any objective, educated person thinks she is anything but a prop.
Click to expand...
It’s pretty silly and pretty sexist (in my view) to discount her rather extensive CV that way. She’s now been in the room where it happens for almost 4 years.
 
Vance with a complete non-answer on whether Trump lost in 2020. On the censorship issue Walz really should have hammered Vance on Trump threatening to jail people who criticize SCOTUS.
 
This has been a good debate so far. Both candidates have acknowledged that their opponent has made good points here and thre (or at least isn't completely insane), and it's been, for the most part, civil. Pretty much a wash, which, IMO, is good for Harris/Walz..
 
You know, one thing I really wish Walz would have done - ask Vance, if Trump asks you to do what he asked Mike Pence to do, will you commit right here and now that you won't agree to overturn the results of the election?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top