ChileG
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,415
Lol, that special started out, “Besides being the first black woman on a major party’s presidential ticket, she is also the first Indian American.”
Keep flailing.
Trump at Nat’l Assoc. of Black Journalists (NABJ)
- Thread starter nycfan
- Start date
- Replies: 526
- Views: 12K
Keep flailing.
- Messages
- 6,347
- Messages
- 6,347
Boy howdy there is a metric fuckton of cope in this post
CallMeTyler
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 607
“A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.”
@PBOHEEL, so you’re opposed to this statement by the presiding judge? Is the judge mistaken, or are you?
Last edited:
ChileG
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,415
You can point it out, but you are still wrong.
She has always been biracial. Always. She attended a HSBC. You’re flailing about and it’s ridiculous.
- Messages
- 29,302
Do you prefer the term sexual predator, then?
- Messages
- 6,347
You seem very upset and very insecure. Have you considered therapy?
CallMeTyler
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 607
The jury convicted Trump. He raped E. Jean Carroll.
If you support Trump, you support a rapist.
Facts are facts, baby!
- Messages
- 6,347
You appear to be [RADIO EDIT] any further, but unfortunately for you I don’t believe in putting [EDIT] people on ignore.[ I believe in humiliating them.] [PLEASE RESIST THIS INCLINATION AND AD HOMINEM ATTACKS IN THE NAME OF RELATIVE BOARD CIVILITY. THANKS.
— ALSO, DO RECONSIDER YOUR STANCE ON THE IGNORE FX FOR THE SAKE OF THE MODS — NYCFAN ]Sure, whenever Harris is convicted by a jury of her peers of being a whore or a slut or a communist or a Marxist or a fake black woman, or whatever else you want to say about her, then you can absolutely call her that on this board!
Last edited by a moderator:
lightbluenc
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 679
Just clarifying. So you like sexual abusers more than rapists. Got it.
What about the time he defrauded his OWN charity, or scammed people from his college? Are those better than rapist?
- Messages
- 1,574
The ironic thing about Republicans whining about "identity politics" is that they seem to be the only ones concerned about it. Harris is out there talking about the future of our country in her speeches, and Trump and his racists minions seems to be the ones fixated entirely on whether she's more Indian or black.
Do you not see this?
lightbluenc
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 679
Ah, conservatives...apparently unable to understand mixed race and ethnicity, so defending saying someone "turned black" is probably the expected reaction. But it's democrats playing "identity politics"?
The stupidity is so annoying, no wonder we're turning into a shithole country, half the population can't understand basic concepts like this.
The stupidity is so annoying, no wonder we're turning into a shithole country, half the population can't understand basic concepts like this.
CallMeTyler
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 607
Did you even read the shared article? It specifically refutes the argument you're attempting to make. You want to have an honest discussion, then actually focus on the merits of the case. Stop trying to obfuscate the topic by bringing unrelated strawmen.
The conviction was clear, the evidence that drove that conviction was clear, and it was a unanimous verdict by a jury, not some partial judge.
Since you don't care to actually read, here's the quoted text for your consumption:
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
aGDevil2k
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,570
That tweet is why I joined Spoutible
Words matter.
If you are just going to define everyone who votes for Trump as part of his “base” then base becomes a meaningless word.
There are base voters and “lesser of two evil” voters and everything in between.
If you want to twist the English language to suit some narrative, I can’t stop you. But it doesn’t make for a very precise way of communicating.
aGDevil2k
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,570
Why do you write like you are trying to be a poet? Do you need a line break between every half-thought? Maybe this is a Tar Pit thing.
- Messages
- 1,574
Yeah what? You just proved my point.
There are policy differences you guys claim to have with her, and yet you guys can't stop discussing the "Is she black? Is she Indian?" stuff instead.
You're all so fucking weird.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 29,302
As with most things, it depends on what you mean as derogatory. If she is found liable in court for sexual assault and the judge publicly states that the behavior would colloquially be considered rape but not technically so under a quirk of NY law, sure.
She failed the bar exam on her first go, passed it the next time, but that feeds a lot of derision. To date, I am not aware of anyone being moderated here for derogatory marks about her intellect, though like anything else, someone dedicated to the task could always go too far.