Trump at Nat’l Assoc. of Black Journalists (NABJ)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 527
  • Views: 12K
I guess if Biden can claim to be Polish, Black, Italian, Greek, Puerto Rican, Jewish etc…. It’s perfectly OK for Harris to switch her heritage depending on the direction of the political winds.

The one hour special CNN did on her being Indian and her Indian heritage is a must see.
Lol, that special started out, “Besides being the first black woman on a major party’s presidential ticket, she is also the first Indian American.”

Keep flailing.
 
Not flailing. Just pointing out the fact she is whatever she needs to be depending upon her audience.

Biden did the same thing. It’s ok. It’s politics 101.

Democrats want to claim the moral high ground on every issue but the American people see through the facade.

Swing state independents will decide the election and from the looks of it Trump is not in bad shape.

When, and a really big “if”, Harris does an unscripted interview without previously knowing the questions she will be exposed.

And many of you here are well aware of that.

Considering I received the same number of primary votes she did I guess it’s not a bad strategy.

She was coronated…. Not elected as the candidate. Never forget that. So many of you accuse the GOP of destroying democracy and norms…..

See any irony?
Boy howdy there is a metric fuckton of cope in this post
 
Last edited:
Not flailing. Just pointing out the fact she is whatever she needs to be depending upon her audience.

Biden did the same thing. It’s ok. It’s politics 101.

Democrats want to claim the moral high ground on every issue but the American people see through the facade.

Swing state independents will decide the election and from the looks of it Trump is not in bad shape.

When, and a really big “if”, Harris does an unscripted interview without previously knowing the questions she will be exposed.

And many of you here are well aware of that.

Considering I received the same number of primary votes she did I guess it’s not a bad strategy.

She was coronated…. Not elected as the candidate. Never forget that. So many of you accuse the GOP of destroying democracy and norms…..

See any irony?
You can point it out, but you are still wrong.
She has always been biracial. Always. She attended a HSBC. You’re flailing about and it’s ridiculous.
 
LOL…. Facts are facts. If the judge was impartial and not a Democrat donor and Trump hater I don’t believe that he would have made that statement.

I believe that most on here perceive Judge Cannon as being a Trump judge correct?

So if the GOP has judges do you not think that the Democrats do as well?

Again, it is politics.

Appreciate the discussion.
Do you prefer the term sexual predator, then?
 
But no substantive reply from you other than I’m a conservative and it’s time to pile on.

FYI… you are one of the main instigators on the old board. Posting 16 hours a day and waiting to blast any opinion you didn’t agree with.

Maybe you should get out more and live life away from the keyboard.
You seem very upset and very insecure. Have you considered therapy?
 
LOL…. Facts are facts. If the judge was impartial and not a Democrat donor and Trump hater I don’t believe that he would have made that statement.

I believe that most on here perceive Judge Cannon as being a Trump judge correct?

So if the GOP has judges do you not think that the Democrats do as well?

Again, it is politics.

Appreciate the discussion.
The jury convicted Trump. He raped E. Jean Carroll.

If you support Trump, you support a rapist.

Facts are facts, baby!
 
Calm him what you want. But calling him a rapist is blatantly false.

I see you are a moderator. Can I refer to Harris in derogatory manners that are not factual and it be acceptable?

Defining moment for this board.

Will be interested to hear your response
You appear to be [RADIO EDIT] any further, but unfortunately for you I don’t believe in putting [EDIT] people on ignore.[ I believe in humiliating them.] [PLEASE RESIST THIS INCLINATION AND AD HOMINEM ATTACKS IN THE NAME OF RELATIVE BOARD CIVILITY. THANKS.🙏— ALSO, DO RECONSIDER YOUR STANCE ON THE IGNORE FX FOR THE SAKE OF THE MODS — NYCFAN ]

Sure, whenever Harris is convicted by a jury of her peers of being a whore or a slut or a communist or a Marxist or a fake black woman, or whatever else you want to say about her, then you can absolutely call her that on this board!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Calm him what you want. But calling him a rapist is blatantly false.

I see you are a moderator. Can I refer to Harris in derogatory manners that are not factual and it be acceptable?

Defining moment for this board.

Will be interested to hear your response
Just clarifying. So you like sexual abusers more than rapists. Got it.

What about the time he defrauded his OWN charity, or scammed people from his college? Are those better than rapist?
 
I guess if Biden can claim to be Polish, Black, Italian, Greek, Puerto Rican, Jewish etc…. It’s perfectly OK for Harris to switch her heritage depending on the direction of the political winds.

The one hour special CNN did on her being Indian and her Indian heritage is a must see.

I mean in all honesty isn’t that the main platform of the Democrat Party? Identity politics?

That is a true statement and has been for decades.

Since the Civil Rights movement look at all the things the Democrats have done for minorities and how they have pulled them out of poverty, increased their education level and provided them with countless job opportunities across the entire employment spectrum.

Not to mention solving the inner city crime problem.
The ironic thing about Republicans whining about "identity politics" is that they seem to be the only ones concerned about it. Harris is out there talking about the future of our country in her speeches, and Trump and his racists minions seems to be the ones fixated entirely on whether she's more Indian or black.

Do you not see this?
 
The charging document said in black and white…. “Not guilty of rape.”

But…. I know the playbook. Repeat a lie as often as possible and it becomes the truth.

The people aren’t buying it. That case will be overturned like the 34 felony convictions and every one with an IQ over 50 knows it.

The entire premise of those trials was to paint Trump in a worse light and run against a convicted felon.

When he is re-elected I’m sure it will be because of Russia, voter suppression, gerrymandering, voter intimidation etc….
So you like sexual abusers instead of rapists? Is that what you're going with?

1722513639157.png
 
Ah, conservatives...apparently unable to understand mixed race and ethnicity, so defending saying someone "turned black" is probably the expected reaction. But it's democrats playing "identity politics"?

The stupidity is so annoying, no wonder we're turning into a shithole country, half the population can't understand basic concepts like this.
 
The charging document said in black and white…. “Not guilty of rape.”

But…. I know the playbook. Repeat a lie as often as possible and it becomes the truth.

The people aren’t buying it. That case will be overturned like the 34 felony convictions and every one with an IQ over 50 knows it.

The entire premise of those trials was to paint Trump in a worse light and run against a convicted felon.

When he is re-elected I’m sure it will be because of Russia, voter suppression, gerrymandering, voter intimidation etc….
Did you even read the shared article? It specifically refutes the argument you're attempting to make. You want to have an honest discussion, then actually focus on the merits of the case. Stop trying to obfuscate the topic by bringing unrelated strawmen.

The conviction was clear, the evidence that drove that conviction was clear, and it was a unanimous verdict by a jury, not some partial judge.

Since you don't care to actually read, here's the quoted text for your consumption:

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
 
See, tweets like that should be removed on Twitter, but with Elon that’s just normal discourse.

According to MAGA, sneakers, felonies and multiple baby mamas = black people in America. And a white man can be blacker than an actual black woman.
That tweet is why I joined Spoutible
 
HeelYeah2012 is part of Trump’s base. He’ll claim he’s not because he voted for Nikki Haley in the primary.

He’s about to vote Trump for the 3rd general election in a row.

He’s a Trumplican.
Words matter.

If you are just going to define everyone who votes for Trump as part of his “base” then base becomes a meaningless word.

There are base voters and “lesser of two evil” voters and everything in between.

If you want to twist the English language to suit some narrative, I can’t stop you. But it doesn’t make for a very precise way of communicating.
 
Can you please post the link to where he was convicted of rape?

If not this is “misinformation” and shouldn’t be allowed.

It’s like saying the election results were false and Trump won.

I believe Trump sued George P. from ABC about that and the case is currently active despite ABC/George trying to have it thrown out.

If facts matter then this should be removed.
Why do you write like you are trying to be a poet? Do you need a line break between every half-thought? Maybe this is a Tar Pit thing.
 
Yeah….
  • Against fracking
  • Abolish private insurance
  • Mandatory gun buybacks
  • Open borders
  • Healthcare for illegal immigrants
  • Banning gasoline/combustion engines by a set date
Yeah what? You just proved my point.

There are policy differences you guys claim to have with her, and yet you guys can't stop discussing the "Is she black? Is she Indian?" stuff instead.

You're all so fucking weird.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top